First Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 27,696
DuLaurence v. Woodlock, et al
as 19-1905
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, for the District of Massachusetts, DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, Honorble, individually and in his official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY J. DULAURENCE, III
Laccinole v. Moneygram Payment Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00473
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 Inclusive, Moneygram Payment Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal
Gicharu v. Carr, et al
as 19-1864
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL KINUTHIA GICHARU
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL E. HOROWITZ, Civil Rights & civil Liberties Complaints,US Department Justice, JAMES MCHENRY, Director Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S Department, DONNA CARR, Chief Clerk, Board of Immigration Appeals
Thurlow v. Zenk
as 19-1891
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL A. ZENK, NH State Prison, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN THURLOW
Foss v. Hayward Industries
as 19-1887
Defendant:
FLOWER CITY, OSBORNEBARR, HAWK GRAPHICS, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CYNTHIA FOSS
Defendant / Appellee:
HAYWARD INDUSTRIES
Kinuthia v. Carr, et al
as 19-1886
Petitioner / Appellant:
NAOMI WAHU KINUTHIA
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM P. BARR, US Attorney General, U.S Department of Justice, DONNA CARR, Chief Clerk, Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), TODD M. LYONS, Acting ICE Field Officer Director, ERO Boston
US v. PR Industrial Development Co.
as 19-1874
3Rd Party Defendant:
PREMIUM FRUIT COMPANY, INC., JUAN OROZCO LTD., INC., COULTER REAGENTS, INC.
and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
PUERTO RICO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
NRO Boston, LLC et al v. Kabbage, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv11901
Plaintiff:
NRO Boston, LLC, Alice Indelicato
Defendant:
Kabbage, Inc., Celtic Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
