First Circuit Other Statutes Cases

Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 27,718
Filpo v. US
as 19-1902
Respondent: UNITED STATES
Petitioner: VICTOR FILPO
In Re: Strege
as 19-1903
Petitioner: ADAM STREGE
Respondent: UNITED STATES
NRO Boston, LLC et al v. Kabbage, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv11901
Plaintiff: NRO Boston, LLC, Alice Indelicato
Defendant: Kabbage, Inc., Celtic Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv30127
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
US v. PR Industrial Development Co.
as 19-1874
3Rd Party Defendant: PREMIUM FRUIT COMPANY, INC., JUAN OROZCO LTD., INC., COULTER REAGENTS, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: PUERTO RICO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
FDIC v. Comvaltech Corp., et al
as 19-1870
3Rd Party Defendant: PFIZER PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WYETH WHITEHALL PHARMACEUTICALS, PFIZER PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC
Defendant / Appellant: EDWIN ANTONIO ALGARIN MOURE, President of Camvaltech, COMVALTECH CORP.
Defendant: HECTOR R. FIGUEROA-FERNANDEZ
Interested Party: LIQUID CAPITAL EXCHANGE, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as receiver of RG Premier Bank of Puerto Rico
Garrett v. Spaulding
as 19-1881
Petitioner / Appellant: WILSON LEE GARRETT, JR.
Respondent / Appellee: STEPHEN SPAULDING, Warden
Mekonnen v. OTG Management, LLC
as 19-1846
Defendant / Appellee: OTG MANAGEMENT, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant: ABEBA MEKONNEN
Defendant: WALID KHAYAT, in his individual capacity
Doe v. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, et al
as 19-1879
Defendant / Appellee: HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, HARVARD PILGRIM PPO PLAN MASSACHUSETTS, Group Policy Number 0588660000
Plaintiff / Appellant: JANE DOE
US v. Herrera-Fuentes
as 19-1889
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: MISAEL HERRERA-FUENTES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?