First Circuit Other Statutes Cases

Cases filed
Cases 71 - 80 of 32,645
Akram v. United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
as 3:2024cv30034
Plaintiff: Naila Akram
Defendant: United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
Loughlin v. Vi-Jon, LLC
as 24-8014
Petitioner: KRISTINA LOUGHLIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent: VI-JON, LLC
De La Cruz-Guerra v. Garland
as 24-1357
Petitioner: JAQUELINE GABRIELA DE LA CRUZ-GUERRA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
In Re: Searson
as 24-8012
Respondent: WILLIAM SEARSON
Interested Party: MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT and MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS
In Re: Dunn
as 24-8011
Respondent: DAVID C. DUNN
Interested Party: NH SUPREME COURT
Sky Tower Puerto Rico Inc. v. Departamento De Desarrollo Economico y Comercio et al
as 3:2024cv01173
Plaintiff: SKY TOWER PUERTO RICO INC.
Defendant: DEPARTAMENTO DE DESARROLLO ECONMICO Y COMERCIO, OFICINA DE GERENCIA DE PERMISOS, Telecommunications Regulatory Board of Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
US v. Lugo-Montalvo
as 24-1344
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: ALAN LUGO-MONTALVO, a/k/a Allan Lugo-Montalvo
Interested Party: EMMA M. GREENWOOD, OSCAR JOSE SERRANO NEGRON and KEHYLIS YOLANDA VAZQUEZ-TORRES
Duarte Cabrera v. Garland
as 24-1352
Petitioner: RAFAEL DUARTE CABRERA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Kersey v. Trump
as 24-1336
Plaintiff: GEORGE E. KERSEY
Defendant: DONALD J. TRUMP
Das et al v. Lowell Five Cents Savings Bank et al
as 1:2024cv10931
Plaintiff: Abhijit Das, Mitra Das, Dr Mukti Das and others
Defendant: Lowell Five Cents Savings Bank, David Wallace, John Pratt, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?