Rhode Island Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,153
Munir v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2023cv00179
Petitioner:
Hasim Munir
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island and Paul A Suttell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benbow v. Coyne-Fague et al
as 1:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Aaron Benbow
Defendant:
Patricia A. Coyne-Fague and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luke v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv00172
Petitioner:
Christopher Luke
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Central Falls Detention Facility Corporation, Warden Michael Nessinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Diaz v. Salisbury, et al.
as 1:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Samuel Diaz
Defendant:
Wayne Salisbury, Carole Dwyer, Jack Shamks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moller v. USA
as 1:2023cv00151
Petitioner:
Michael J. Moller
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Meeker v. Houston House
as 1:2023cv00148
Petitioner:
Gregory Meeker
Respondent:
Houston House and Patrick McFarland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gonzalez v. LeClair et al
as 1:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Tony G. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Brian LeClair, Paul Rioles, Tracey Bonang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navarro v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Angel L. Navarro
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jenyo v. RRM Philadelphia
as 1:2023cv00083
Petitioner:
Babawale F. Jenyo
Respondent:
RRM Philadelphia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vose v. Neronha
as 1:2023cv00084
Petitioner:
Carlton Vose
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney Peter Neronha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
