Tenth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 49,432
Seeley (PS) v. County of Denver et al
as 1:2024cv01013
Plaintiff:
Clarence Wayne Seeley, III and Clarence Seeley, III
Defendant:
County of Denver, City of Denver, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lombard-Jackson (PS) v. Girard et al
as 1:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
Kiki Lombard-Jackson and Kiki Patricia Lombard-Jackson
Defendant:
Girard and Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez (PS) v. Austin et al
as 1:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Lloyd Austin, Burnes and Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dimmer (PS) v. USA
as 1:2024cv01023
Plaintiff:
Derneval Dimmer
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Veal (PS) v. El Paso County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
Darryl R. Veal
Defendant:
El Paso County Sheriff Office, El Paso County Sheriff Detention, Wellpath Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan (PS) v. Core Civic Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv01041
Plaintiff:
Marciene James Sullivan
Defendant:
Core Civic Corporation, Virgil Ensey and CHAP Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan (PS) v. Core Civic Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv01044
Plaintiff:
Marciene James Sullivan
Defendant:
Core Civic Corporation, Virgil Ensley, CDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes (ID 105577) v. McClain
as 5:2024cv03054
Plaintiff:
Dashawn M. Hughes
Defendant:
Christopher McClain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ponce v. Mortenson et al
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Ponce
Defendant:
Bart Mortenson, Cassidy Ross, FNU Luna and others
Interested Party:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
