Tenth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 49,348
Johnson v. Harding
as 5:2024cv00355
Petitioner:
Michael D Johnson
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webster v. CHP Correctional Health Partners
as 24-1134
Plaintiff:
RONALD L. WEBSTER
Defendant:
CHP CORRECTIONAL HEALTH PARTNERS
McKinney (PS) v. People of the State of Colorado, The
as 1:2024cv00954
Petitioner:
Kevin Lewayne McKinney and Kevin L. McKinney
Respondent:
People of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flowers (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2024cv00963
Petitioner:
Kenyatta Flowers
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fernandez (PS) v. ICE/DHS et al
as 1:2024cv00971
Petitioner:
Javier Balbuena Fernandez
Respondent:
ICE/DHS, Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ornelas (PS) v. Long et al
as 1:2024cv00965
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ornelas
Defendant:
Long and Logan County Combined Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez (PS) v. John Doe #1
as 1:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Defendant:
John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chenoweth (PS) v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00967
Plaintiff:
Anthony John Chenoweth
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Lengerich, Fhuere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown (PS) v. Marquez et al
as 1:2024cv00968
Plaintiff:
Ezamika Brown
Defendant:
Marquez, Juarez, Mark Fairbairn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waters v. Naylor
as 5:2024cv03049
Plaintiff:
Randall S. Waters
Defendant:
Robert D. Naylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
