US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed
Cases 31 - 40 of 4,226
RSS Feed | View as table
Smith v. Wendy's Inc. (MAG+) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00163
Plaintiff: Peter J. Smith
Defendant: Wendy's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00164
Plaintiff: Peter J. Smith
Defendant: Kay Ivey and Cody Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff: Peter J. Smith
Defendant: Kay Ivey, Bob Riley, John Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00153
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Miles v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff: Vernus Miles
Defendant: John Q. Hamm and Chadwick Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. Montgomery County Detention Facility et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00145
Plaintiff: Kenneth Henderson
Defendant: Montgomery County Detention Facility and Sgt. Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00147
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?