US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 2,080
Drummond v. Respiratory Sleep Solutions dba Stratus Neuro
as 1:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Drummond
Defendant:
Respiratory Sleep Solutions dba Stratus Neuro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Conner v. McNeal et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dewayne Cooner
Defendant:
Kendrick McNeal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley v. St Luke's Episcopal School
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Arisha Williams Bradley
Defendant:
St Luke's Episcopal School
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Brouillette v. Sherman et al
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
John Michael Brouillette, Sr.
Defendant:
Michael D. Sherman, Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, Alabama Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
White v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Patricia White
Defendant:
Donald Taylor and Justin Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Williams v. Nexstar Media Group et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
Nexstar Media Group, Perry A. Sooks, Geoff Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gossett v. Davidson et al
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
James Gossett
Defendant:
J Davidson and Luke Cowan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
