US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,080
Jemison et al v. Pena et al
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Allyson Jemison, Mary Jemison, Rachel Roberson and others
Defendant:
Angel Pena and City Of Foley Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith v. Brakefield et al
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Tanja Laverne Smith
Defendant:
Marcus Brakefield, Jeff Moore, Sarah Luz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Broadhead v. VIA Health Center
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Julia Broadhead
Defendant:
VIA Health Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 rt Job Discrimination/Retaliation
Harris v. Stringer
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Danita L. Harris
Defendant:
Richard Stringer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stennis-Marino v. Marino et al
as 1:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
Kena L. Stennis-Marino
Defendant:
Nolan P. Marino, Tysianna Marino and Kristie Marino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brouillette v. Mobile County District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
John Michael Brouillette, Sr.
Defendant:
Mobile County District Attorney's Office, Ashley Rich, Keith Blackwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Daniels et al
as 1:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
Luther Steven Montgomery, Jr.
Defendant:
Cody P. Daniels, Sgt. John Hicks and City of Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
