Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 6,290
Odom v. Baldwin et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Eric Vernardo Odom
Defendant:
Ben H. Brooks and Jeffery Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Agho-Allen v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00101
Petitioner:
Itohan Agho-Allen
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Koko v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Egobundu Kate Koko
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cowart v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
John Cowart
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pelayo v. Keyes (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Glenn Bonilla Pelayo
Defendant:
R. D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hicks v. Horton
as 4:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Dalton Hicks
Respondent:
Jonathan Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Motamoros-Santillan v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Irma Motamoros-Santillan and Irma Matamoros-Santillan
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jacinto v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
Monica E. Galvan Jacinto
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Guevara v. Keyes (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Guevara
Defendant:
R. D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burnett v. Horton
as 4:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Charles Burnett
Respondent:
Jonathan Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
