Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 6,290
Cobb v. McClain et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Steven Lavon Cobb
Defendant:
Antonio McClain, Steve Marshall and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
Connie Monique Moore
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jacobson v. Horton
as 4:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
David Otto Jacobson
Respondent:
Jonathan W Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Salas v. Warden Neely
as 7:2023cv01768
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Hernandez Salas
Respondent:
Warden Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moore v. McClain et al
as 7:2023cv01762
Plaintiff:
Robert Moore
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv01757
Petitioner:
Richard L Wilson
Respondent:
Warden Williams and Hon. Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. McClain et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00739
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Wilson
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDaniel v. Crabtree et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
Markel Jason McDaniel
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree, Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robles v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01748
Plaintiff:
Maribel Amaya Robles
Defendant:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01687
Petitioner:
Ana Marie Hernandez
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
