US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,664
ROSE-BURRELL v. CITY OF MONROE et al
as 3:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
LALLYMAY ROSE-BURREL
Defendant:
CITY OF MONROE, NICHOLAS SILVERBERG and OFFICER RYAN GEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN et al v. HATCHER
as 5:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
DARLENE BROWN and KELVIN BROWN
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT LATRICE HATCHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
NIX v. CALLAHAN et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
CHIP W NIX
Defendant:
MICHAEL CALLAHAN and JAMES STEINBERG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MACKRELL et al v. BUTLER
as 7:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
HALEY MACKRELL and M T M
Defendant:
ANGELA BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUMPHREY v. MOODY et al
as 7:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HUMPHREY
Defendant:
JAMES MOODY, ASHLEY KERN and RODNEY FOULKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
EUBANKS v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP et al
as 3:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
BECKY L EUBANKS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP and WALMART INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
PORTER et al v. CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT OF COLUMBUS GEORGIA et al
as 4:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Clarence Nash and Tonyaneka Porter
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT OF COLUMBUS GEORGIA, Luis Morales, Jr. and LUIS MORALES, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CRANE v. CLARK et al
as 5:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
AMY CRANE
Defendant:
SARAH CLARK, BRANDI CUNNINGHAM and ASHLEY SLAUGHTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
