US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 3,664
GRAHAM v. CRISP REGIONAL HOSPITAL
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
HILDA GRAHAM
Defendant:
CRISP REGIONAL HOSPITAL, PAVEL BOMAR, MARISSA BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
STEWART v. SAMPSON
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BRYAN STEWART
Defendant:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
WALKER et al v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 5:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER WALKER and ANTONIO WALKER
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and ANDREA PETTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
NARCUSSE v. GENESYS HEALTH ALLIANCE et al
as 5:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
Marie Narcisse and MARIE M MARCISSE
Defendant:
GENESYS HEALTH ALLIANCE, Peter Wrobel, Shad Stormant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
