US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 995
JBS Hair, Inc. v. Beauty Essence, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01860
Plaintiff:
JBS Hair, Inc.
Defendant:
Beauty Essence, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
JBS Hair, Inc. v. Sun Taiyang Co., Ltd.
as 1:2021cv01857
Plaintiff:
JBS Hair, Inc.
Defendant:
Sun Taiyang Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Unwired Asset Management LLC v. Twilio Inc.
as 1:2021cv01275
Defendant:
Twilio Inc.
Plaintiff:
Unwired Asset Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
D Cut Products, Inc. v. William M. Bird and Co., Inc.
as 1:2021cv01271
Defendant:
William M. Bird and Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
D Cut Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Biotronik, Inc. v. W.H. Wall Family Holding LLLP
as 1:2021cv01124
Plaintiff:
Biotronik, Inc.
Defendant:
W.H. Wall Family Holding LLLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Billet Machine and Fabrication, Inc. v. FuelTech USA, LLC
as 1:2021cv00974
Defendant:
FuelTech USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
Billet Machine and Fabrication, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Mobile Networking Solutions, LLC v. E*TRADE Financial Holdings, LLC
as 1:2021cv00947
Defendant:
E*TRADE Financial Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff:
Mobile Networking Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Karmagreen, LLC v. MRSS Inc.
as 1:2021cv00674
Plaintiff:
Karmagreen, LLC
Defendant:
MRSS Inc.
Counter Defendant:
James Peter Morrissette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Satco Products, Inc. v. Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv00643
Defendant:
Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. and Seoul Semiconductor, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Satco Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Thursday Pools LLC v. Discount Fiberglass Pools, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00143
Plaintiff:
Thursday Pools LLC
Defendant:
Discount Fiberglass Pools, Inc. doing business as Tallman Pools
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
