US District Court for the District of Columbia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 4,916
TADESSE v. OREGON STATE CT & COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
YODIT DAGNE TADESSE
Defendant:
OREGON STATE CT & COUNTY, JOHN L. BARLOW, STUBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LYLE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
EDWARD W. LYLE
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
N. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
L. N., Jessica North Macie and Jani North Saale
Defendant:
District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
ALLEN v. NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION
as 1:2024cv00096
Defendant:
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION and N.R.A.
Plaintiff:
WALTER ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALLEN v. DEPT. OF CITY WIDE ADMIN. SVCS.
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
WALTER ALLEN
Defendant:
DEPT. OF CITY WIDE ADMIN. SVCS.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FISCHER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
ALAN E. FISCHER and JOHN DOES 1-10,000
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, US CAPITOL POLICE DEPARTMENT, DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
TATUM v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
THOMAS TATUM
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, METROPOLITAN POLICE, DANIEL THAU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
GRIFFIN v. SMITH et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
MARK GRIFFIN
Defendant:
PAMELA SMITH, JOHN DOE and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
GUERTIN v. LEIPFERT
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
PAUL MICHAEL GUERTIN
Defendant:
ROBIN LEIPFERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HOOLI v. COMBS et al
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
BASAVARAJ HOOLI
Defendant:
TODD COMBS and LARRY MITCHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
