US District Court for the District of Columbia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 4,916
VARGO v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
DERRICK VARGO
Defendant:
BRYANT WILLIAMS and JAMES MICHAEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ALLEN v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
WALTER L. ALLEN
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WHITE v. BAGSHAW et al
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA CHARITY WHITE
Defendant:
JASON BAGSHAW, NEIL MCALLISTER and JAMES MICHAEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALLEN v. BROOKLYN BOARD OF ELECTIONS
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
WALTER L. ALLEN
Defendant:
BROOKLYN BOARD OF ELECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
CRAWFORD v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL BOARD
as 1:2023cv03906
Plaintiff:
MIA CRAWFORD
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL BOARD
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
WINSTON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2023cv03832
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN WINSTON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and KATHLEEN LANDERKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CREAR v. AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP INC.
as 1:2023cv03812
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Crear
Defendant:
American Airlines Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DEMITRY v. ROSMAN
as 1:2023cv03780
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DEMITRY
Defendant:
MACKENZIE ROSMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CANTY v. FERGUSON
as 1:2023cv03781
Plaintiff:
Omarr S. Canty
Defendant:
Officer Thaddeus Ferguson and THADDEUS FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
KLAYMAN v. KOLLAR-KOTELLY
as 1:2023cv03773
Plaintiff:
LARRY KLAYMAN
Defendant:
Hon. COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY and COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
