Federal Circuit Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 47,678
COOK v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00467
Petitioner:
JERRY COOK
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
GADDIS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00470
Petitioner:
JOSEPH GADDIS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
SMITH v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00471
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. SMITH
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
ROGERS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00462
Petitioner:
EMMA ROGERS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
VANEK v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00461
Petitioner:
CATHALEEN VANEK
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
CROWLEY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00464
Petitioner:
PHILIP CROWLEY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
HAMIL v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00466
Petitioner:
KATHLEEN A. HAMIL
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
GARLAND et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00465
Petitioner:
JOHN GARLAND, SHANNON LAND and ERIN ALBERT
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
HORNER v. USA
as 1:2025cv00469
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE MARGARET-ANN HORNER
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Godfrey v. Collins
as 25-1531
Claimant:
CURTIS D. GODFREY
Respondent:
DOUGLAS A. COLLINS, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
