Eastern District of Pennsylvania Cases

Cases filed

Cases 11 - 20 of 267,931
COBB THEATRES IV, LLC v. WORTHINGTON ASSOCIATES UNIT B OWNER, L.P.
as 2:2015cv02878
Plaintiff: COBB THEATRES IV, LLC
Defendant: WORTHINGTON ASSOCIATES UNIT B OWNER, L.P.
Cause Of Action: Declaratory Judgement
GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. SMITH
as 2:2015cv02865
Plaintiff: GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
Defendant: ROBERT SMITH
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Other Contract
JOST v. COLVIN
as 2:2015cv02867
Plaintiff: JOANNE M. JOST
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ROBERT JAMES SALES, INC. v. ROBERTS FILTER HOLDING COMPANY et al
as 2:2015cv02872
Plaintiff: ROBERT JAMES SALES, INC.
Defendant: ROBERTS FILTER HOLDING COMPANY, ROBERTS FILTER GROUP, ROBERTS INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Other Contract
BROWN v. ENHANCED RECOVERY CORPORATION, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02869
Plaintiff: TAMARA C. BROWN
Defendant: ENHANCED RECOVERY CORPORATION, LLC, TRANS UNION LLC, EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
FRAZIER v. SCI DALLAS et al
as 2:2015cv02860
Petitioner: JAMES FRAZIER
Respondent: SCI DALLAS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCLEOD v. COLVIN
as 2:2015cv02871
Plaintiff: JAMES PRESTON MCLEOD
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DUQUE-BETTIES et al v. KMART et al
as 2:2015cv02875
Plaintiff: JUDITH M. DUQUE-BETTIES , JOHN BETTIES
Defendant: KMART , KMART HOLDING CORPORATION , SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
WEAVER
as 2:2015mc00138
Cause Of Action: Disbarment Proceedings
JONES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv02834
Plaintiff: DUANE JONES
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHARLES H. RAMSEY, JUSTIN FRANK and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.