Eastern District of Pennsylvania Cases

Cases filed


Cases 11 - 20 of 283,770
BIXLER v. KEMPER et al
as 2:2017cv04672
Plaintiff: SUZANNE BIXLER
Defendant: KEMPER , UNITRIN AUTO AND HOME INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04675
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04678
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
KIM et al v. VLEISIDES
as 2:2017cv04673
Plaintiff: GIU KIM , JEA-SOOK KIM
Defendant: CHRISTINA VLEISIDES
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04677
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JEROME v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv04674
Plaintiff: VINCENT JEROME
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SCOTT et al v. PETERSON et al
as 2:2017cv04657
Plaintiff: DAVID J. SCOTT , PAMELA SCOTT
Defendant: ANDREW P. PETERSON, SYSCO LEASING LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04636
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
JACKSON v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS et al
as 2:2017cv04653
Plaintiff: NANETTE JACKSON
Defendant: QUEST DIAGNOSTICS , QUEST DIAGNOSTICS OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC.
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
SCHWARTZENGRABER v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN et al
as 2:2017cv04656
Plaintiff: SCOTT SCHWARTZENGRABER
Defendant: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN, AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?