Eastern District of Pennsylvania Cases

Cases filed

Cases 41 - 50 of 267,931
RUSHING v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2015cv02853
Plaintiff: VIRGIL RUSHING
Defendant: PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, KAREN M. BRYANT, MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
ALBRIGHT v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015mc00140
Plaintiff: WAYNE ALBRIGHT
Defendant: NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, JOSEPH BOARDMAN, BRANDON BOSTIAN and others
Cause Of Action: False Claims Act
RUSHING v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2015cv02855
Plaintiff: VIRGIL RUSHING
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
MCNEIL v. GLOBAL TEK & LINK PHONE CO. et al
as 2:2015cv02859
Plaintiff: TERRY MCNEIL
Defendant: GLOBAL TEL & LINK PHONE CO., JANICE A. BRAZILE
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02870
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal
ZURLA v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv02841
Plaintiff: ABBY H. ZURLA
Defendant: THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
RATTLIFF et al v. BARTON et al
as 2:2015cv02844
Plaintiff: MICHAEL B. RATTLIFF , LINDA ALLEN RATTLIFF
Defendant: MICHAEL A. BARTON, ATLANTIC WATER PRODUCTS
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
SERRANO v. COLVIN
as 2:2015cv02816
Plaintiff: NEAL SERRANO
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
STULL v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC
as 2:2015cv02818
Plaintiff: ERIC STULL
Defendant: PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
LAINE et al v. CORBIN et al
as 5:2015cv02821
Plaintiff: SANDRA H. LAINE , ASHTON W. LAINE, II
Defendant: JESSE M. CORBIN, MARK D. CORBIN
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Auto Negligence
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.