US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 11,730
DAUGHTRY v. CEKADA et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
MARTIQUE DAUGHTRY
Defendant:
CO CEKADA, CO RANKIN, CO HERKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WITHERSPOON v. USA
as 2:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
CAMEO WITHERSPOON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
HYMAN v. WARDEN et al
as 3:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
JAVON HYMAN
Respondent:
WARDEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOE v. CRISTINI et al
as 2:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
R. CRISTINI and E. HURD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, SCOTT KLEINFELTER and MICHELLE IVICIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SHELTON v. PA. BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE et al
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
NORMAN SHELTON
Defendant:
PA. BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, SUPERINTENDANT MS. THOMSON and TONY SPREARS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. FCI MCKEAN
as 1:2024cv00076
Petitioner:
DOMINIQUE J. HOLMES
Respondent:
WARDEN OF FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ALLEN v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
JULIUS ALLEN
Defendant:
U/K JOHNSON CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, U/K ARNOLD LIEUTENANT and U/K VANDIVNER CORRECTIONAL OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. USA
as 2:2024cv00334
Petitioner:
IKLAS RICHARD DAVIS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
DAVIS v. USA
as 2:2024cv00335
Petitioner:
IKLAS RICHARD DAVIS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
