Pennsylvania Civil Rights Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 420
Sheare v. Brockman
as 4:2018cv01476
Plaintiff:
Richard Sheare and Richard Shearer
Defendant:
Edward Brockman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PETERSON v. PENNROSE PROPERTIES, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00764
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA PETERSON
Defendant:
PENNROSE PROPERTIES, LLC , LAUREL ESTATES HOUSING, L.P. , TINA GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TATE v. SUPERVISOR HUD
as 1:2018cv00148
Plaintiff:
AMOS LEE TATE
Defendant:
SUPERVISOR HUD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
GRAHAM v. AETNA, INC.
as 5:2018cv02027
Plaintiff:
LESLIE GRAHAM
Defendant:
AETNA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CORONADO v. SEQUENTIAL TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL (STI), LLC et al
as 5:2018cv01990
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA CORONADO
Defendant:
SEQUENTIAL TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL (STI), LLC and COWORKX STAFFING SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
COLEMAN v. CEDAR WOODS CARE MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2018cv01961
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY COLEMAN
Defendant:
CEDAR WOODS CARE MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
TRIPATHI v. MURANO CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
as 2:2018cv01840
Plaintiff:
AKHILESH TRIPATHI
Defendant:
MURANO CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION and JERRY MINGIONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Angulo v. Tarapchak et al
as 3:2018cv00736
Plaintiff:
Gabriella Angulo
Defendant:
Rachel Tarapchak , Alex Tarapchak and R & A, L.L.C.
Counterclaim_plaintiff:
Alex Tarapchak , Rachel Tarapchak and R & A, L.L.C.
Counterclaim_defendant:
Gabriella Angulo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TINDALL et al v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY
as 2:2018cv00160
Plaintiff:
DASHAWNA TINDALL , JIMMAYA PRITCHARD , RASHAD COLE and others
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LAMB v. PRECISION POLYMER PRODUCTS, INC.
as 2:2018cv00434
Plaintiff:
MONICA LAMB
Defendant:
PRECISION POLYMER PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
