Pennsylvania Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 46,699
Sciarre v. Susquehanna Police Department
as 1:2024cv00667
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sciarre
Defendant:
Susquehanna Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
TANDE v. STONE
as 2:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
FILBERT TANDE
Defendant:
TRACY STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Nelson v. Luzerne County DA's Office et al
as 3:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Corey J. Nelson
Defendant:
Luzerne County DA's Office, Judge(s) and Adult Probation/Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson-Pacewicz, Sr. v. Luzerne County ETL et al
as 3:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Corey J. Nelson-Pacewicz, Sr.
Defendant:
Luzerne County ETL and Luzerne County Children & Youth Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COVINGTON v. PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv01571
Plaintiff:
ROXANNE COVINGTON
Defendant:
PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and POLICE OFFICER DOUGLAS WELLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01580
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Gibson v. Susquehanna Twp Codes Office
as 1:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gibson
Defendant:
Susquehanna Twp Codes Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LUCAS v. SPUSTA et al
as 1:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Herbert Lucas
Defendant:
Sergeant Joseph S. Spusta and COUNTY OF ERIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
