Fourth Circuit Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 3,156
Graham Packaging Company, L.P. v. Indorama Ventures Alphapet Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00795
Respondent:
Indorama Ventures PCL, Auriga Polymers, Inc. and Indorama Ventures Alphapet Holdings, Inc.
Petitioner:
Graham Packaging Company, L.P.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
La Jolla Pharma, LLC v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01491
Plaintiff:
La Jolla Pharma, LLC
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
VDPP LLC v. Honey Optics LLC
as 7:2024cv04529
Plaintiff:
VDPP LLC
Defendant:
Honey Optics LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01438
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Non-Infringement- Right to Compensation
Engineered Inserts & Systems Inc v. baier & michels GmbH & Co KG et al
as 6:2024cv04453
Plaintiff:
Engineered Inserts & Systems Inc
Defendant:
baier & michels USA Inc and baier & michels GmbH & Co KG
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Advanced Lithium Electrochemistry (Cayman) Co. Ltd. et al v. Hydro-Quebec et al
as 1:2024cv01421
Defendant:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, LiFePO4+C Licensing AG, Universite de Montreal and others
Plaintiff:
Advanced Lithium Electrochemistry (Cayman) Co. Ltd. and Advanced Lithium Electrochemistry Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Omnitek Partners, LLC v. Rafael U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2024cv02349
Plaintiff:
OMNITEK PARTNERS, LLC
Defendant:
Rafael U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Stecker v. Dority & Manning, PA et al
as 6:2024cv04415
Plaintiff:
Wells Richmond Stecker
Defendant:
Tyler Epsy, Dority & Manning, PA, Parks Workman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01391
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01370
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
