US District Court for the District of Maryland Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 17,214
Ross v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Carl Javan Ross
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00729
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Walls v. Bivens et al
as 1:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
Jachin Boaz Walls, Sr.
Defendant:
Warden Carlos Bivens, Dr. Kyle Smith, Andrea Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. DPSCS
as 1:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Jahi Rashad Hamilton
Defendant:
DPSCS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sorrick v. West et al
as 1:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sorrick
Defendant:
Warden, Warden Walter West, Warden Deborah Darden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Shaidon Blake
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Brian Fish and Patricia Jessemy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Witherspoon v. Weber
as 1:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Edward Witherspoon
Defendant:
Ronald S Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Geer v. Dean et al
as 1:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Geer
Defendant:
Mr. Dean, Mr. John Doe, Mr. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sucik v. Warden et al
as 1:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Timothy Sucik
Defendant:
Warden, Asst. Warden and Chief of Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tilghman v. Princess Anne Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
Bradford Tilghman
Defendant:
Princess Anne Police Department and Officer Thomas McMenemy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
