Eastern District of North Carolina Cases

Cases filed

Cases 21 - 30 of 23,146
Foy v. United States of America et al
as 5:2017cv00080
Plaintiff: Richard C. Foy
Defendant: United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama, US Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Wernock et al
as 7:2017cv00025
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant: Geraldine Wernock, James Eves, III, Dawna Marie Hight
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Murchison v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2017hc02030
Petitioner: Linwood B. Murchison
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. USA
as 4:2017cv00019
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Larry D. Hill, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate Sentence
PICKETT v. Berryhill
as 7:2017cv00024
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
Implus Footcare, LLC v. Sequential Brands Group, Inc.
as 5:2017cv00076
Plaintiff: Implus Footcare, LLC
Defendant: Sequential Brands Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Inko-Tariah v. North Carolina Relay Service
as 5:2017ct03041
Plaintiff: Charles A. Inko-Tariah
Defendant: North Carolina Relay Service
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lanier v. Hands et al
as 5:2017ct03042
Plaintiff: Ricardo Edwin Lanier
Defendant: Correctional Officer Hands, K. Drew, Sergeant Leigh and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall et al v. Jones County Board of Commissioners et al
as 4:2017cv00018
Plaintiff: John Hall , Elaine Robinson-Strayhorn , Lindora Toudle and others
Defendant: Jones County Board of Commissioners, Frank Emory, W. Michael Haddock and others
Cause Of Action: Violation of Civil Rights
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Nave v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2017mc00010
Plaintiff: Charles Nave
Defendant: Unnamed Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?