Eastern District of North Carolina Cases

Cases filed


Cases 31 - 40 of 23,152
Hill v. USA
as 4:2017cv00019
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Larry D. Hill, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate Sentence
Inko-Tariah v. North Carolina Relay Service
as 5:2017ct03041
Plaintiff: Charles A. Inko-Tariah
Defendant: North Carolina Relay Service
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Bivens Act
King et al v. Perry et al
as 5:2017ct03043
Plaintiff: Timothy Royal King, Michael Blakney, Derick White and others
Defendant: Frank L. Perry, W. David Guice, Cynthia Thornton and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall et al v. Jones County Board of Commissioners et al
as 4:2017cv00018
Plaintiff: John Hall , Elaine Robinson-Strayhorn , Lindora Toudle and others
Defendant: Jones County Board of Commissioners, Frank Emory, W. Michael Haddock and others
Cause Of Action: Violation of Civil Rights
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Nave v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2017mc00010
Plaintiff: Charles Nave
Defendant: Unnamed Defendant
Lanier v. Hands et al
as 5:2017ct03042
Plaintiff: Ricardo Edwin Lanier
Defendant: Correctional Officer Hands, K. Drew, Sergeant Leigh and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Brannon v. Avinger et al
as 7:2017cv00022
Plaintiff: Carlene R. Brannon
Defendant: James L. Avinger , Stan Koch & Sons Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Implus Footcare, LLC v. Sequential Brands Group, Inc.
as 5:2017cv00076
Plaintiff: Implus Footcare, LLC
Defendant: Sequential Brands Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
CELL FILM HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOES 1-2
as 5:2017cv00075
Petitioner: CELL Film Holdings, LLC
Respondent: DOES 1-2
Cause Of Action: Copyright Infringement
Fitzgerald v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2017hc02027
Petitioner: Gregory Fitzgerald
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?