US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,302
MCGILL v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY
as 1:2024cv00206
Petitioner:
MELISSA GRIFFIN MCGILL
Respondent:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LYNN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00194
Petitioner:
GARY GIOVON LYNN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HILL v. ISHEE
as 1:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
SIMARON D. HILL
Respondent:
TODD ISHEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMALL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
STEPHEN ALLEN SMALL, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
KNOX v. USA
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
CEDERICK EURYAN KNOX
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
NEAL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER LEE NEAL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
BENITEZ-FLORES v. USA
as 1:2024cv00136
Petitioner:
JORGE LUIS BENITEZ-FLORES
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
LAMBERT v. RANDOLPH COUNTY COURT
as 1:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
BRANSON LAMBERT
Respondent:
RANDOLPH COUNTY COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
JOINER v. FORSYTH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
as 1:2024cv00094
Petitioner:
RAYMOND DAKIM HARRIS JOINER
Respondent:
FORSYTH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHAMBERS v. GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF
as 1:2024cv00051
Petitioner:
DWIGHT CHAMBERS
Respondent:
GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
