US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,779
LOTHARP v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00662
Plaintiff:
ZANNIE J. LOTHARP
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
JONES v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2023cv00646
Plaintiff:
HENRY CALVIN JONES
Defendant:
MALINDA THOMAS, MS. GROOMS, MICHAEL L. SCARBORO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. AULD
as 1:2023cv00647
Plaintiff:
JORDAN N. MITCHELL
Defendant:
PATRICK L. AULD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
TYLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
DAVID B. SMITH, THE FORSYTH COUNTY L.E.D.C, ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PATTERSON v. WOLFE et al
as 1:2023cv00614
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LEE PATTERSON
Defendant:
M.G. WOLFE, B. LAWS and OFFICER(S) JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMAN v. WIGGS et al
as 1:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
QUENTON D. HOLMAN
Defendant:
A.T. WIGGS, K. KLUTTZ, UNIDENTIFIED DUKE CAMPUS POLICE OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALEXANDER v. YADKIN COUNTY COURTHOUSE
as 1:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ISAAC ALEXANDER
Defendant:
YADKIN COUNTY COURTHOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOTHARP v. DUPRE
as 1:2023cv00576
Plaintiff:
ZANNIE JAY LOTHARP
Defendant:
NICOLE R. DUPRE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LILES v. EDWARDS
as 1:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
REGINALD MAURICE LILES
Defendant:
BRITTANY P. EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
QUEEN v. CITY OF GREENSBORO et al
as 1:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
DARNELL QUEEN
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENSBORO, JOHN DOE I, II, III & IV, FORMER A.D.A. MAURY HUBBARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
