North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 5,339
Thomas v. Pate et al
as 5:2024ct03099
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant:
Lt. Pate, Robeson County, Burnis Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acuna v. Jastal et al
as 5:2024ct03097
Plaintiff:
Raymondo Acuna
Defendant:
Lt. M. Jastal and Officer Finley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Williams v. Kalinowski et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Williams
Defendant:
FNU Kalinowski, Melissa Becker and Charles Bumgarner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Bynum
as 5:2024ct03096
Plaintiff:
Telyzuan Ja'Keith Hawkins
Defendant:
Lt. Bynum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MASHORE v. NAVES
as 1:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
RODRIQUEZ DWAYNE MASHORE
Defendant:
SGT JASON JAGGER NAVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Bullard et al
as 5:2024ct03095
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Williams, Christopher Mosby, Gabrial E. Cummings and others
Defendant:
Jamie Bullard, Marc McPherson, Jason Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPENCE v. TOLBERT et al
as 1:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
KENYON J. SPENCE
Defendant:
SGT. TOLBERT and SGT. LENWOOD GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blankenship v. Buchanan et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Evan William Blankenship
Defendant:
Ricky T. Buchanan, H. Helms and A. Scearse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. Barker et al
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Quamaine Massey
Defendant:
Robert T. Barker, Curtis Tate, Peter Buchholte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riddle v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wayne Riddle
Defendant:
C.J. Wilson, Mark Gouge, William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
