District Court Cases in South Carolina
Cases 71 - 80 of 77,041
Harvell v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 6:2023cv01166
Plaintiff:
Paisley A Harvell, Jr
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
McKinney v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1
as 8:2023cv01165
Plaintiff:
Jason L McKinney
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Alan Otten v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01187
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Otten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Graves v. Nelsen et al
as 9:2023cv01172
Plaintiff:
Maurice Graves
Defendant:
Kenneth Nelsen, Sgt. Moore and Sgt. Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Richardson et al v. Dollar Tree Stores Inc
as 3:2023cv01179
Plaintiff:
Patrick Richardson
Defendant:
John Doe and Dollar Tree Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv01167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Cooper v. State of South Carolina
as 6:2023cv01170
Petitioner:
Gene Tony Cooper, Jr
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. Taylor et al
as 2:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Robbie Collins
Defendant:
Lt. Taylor, Warden Palmer and Assistant Warden Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pinnacle Coating & Converting Inc v. S Walter Packaging Corp
as 7:2023cv01180
Plaintiff:
Pinnacle Coating & Converting Inc
Defendant:
S Walter Packaging Corp
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
