US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 3,313
Cooper v. Med Staff of RRJ et al
as 2:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Med Staff of RRJ, Dental at RRJ and Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Herber Otoniel Luna Contreras
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pace v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Pace, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Clarke et al
as 2:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Michael Sean Taylor
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Kevin Macoy, T. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Claudio v. State Farm Correctional Center et al
as 2:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Carlos Figueroa Claudio
Defendant:
State Farm Correctional Center and VA Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. Darden et al
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Derek Kent Rose
Defendant:
Tony Darden, Cris Desmond, Angela Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Kennety et al
as 2:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Kennety, Johnson and Wallens Ridge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heston v. Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 2:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Ian Heston
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Kilcore et al
as 2:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Keith Rice
Defendant:
Major Kilcore, Captain McCoy, Courple Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Mullen et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
B. Mullen and WRSP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
