US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 5,964
Humphrey v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00256
Petitioner:
Ronald Humphrey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
James v. Lovett
as 3:2023cv00257
Petitioner:
Calvin James
Respondent:
Current custodian S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
James v. Lovett
as 5:2023cv00368
Petitioner:
Calvin James
Respondent:
Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Terrell v. Lovette
as 5:2023cv00369
Petitioner:
Brooks Terrell
Respondent:
Warden Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Lovett
as 5:2023cv00370
Petitioner:
Durrell Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Stanley Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wells v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00371
Petitioner:
Andrivia Frances Wells
Respondent:
Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McKinley v. USA
as 1:2023cv00105
Petitioner:
Randy Dean McKinley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hill v. Government for the State of West Virginia et al
as 3:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Eric Rodney Hill
Defendant:
Government for the State of West Virginia and F.C.I. Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00362
Petitioner:
Lionel A. Thomas
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ellinger v. North Central Regional Jail
as 5:2023cv00365
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Emanuel Ellinger
Respondent:
North Central Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
