Fifth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Prison Condition Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 11,416
Porter v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2024cv01127
Plaintiff: Tomarcus Porter
Defendant: Cody Mitchell, Jules Herbert, Connor Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Sealy
as 2:2024cv01120
Plaintiff: Don Lewis
Defendant: Sherri Sealy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kahoe v. Mel et al
as 3:2024cv00337
Plaintiff: Lonnie J. Kahoe, Sr.
Defendant: Unknown Mel, Unknown Johnson and Unknown Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnham v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00336
Plaintiff: Richard Burnham
Defendant: Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnham v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00335
Plaintiff: Richard Burnham
Defendant: Tim Hooper and Jacob Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. UNKNOWN MAKER OF ZANTAC RANITIDINE et al
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff: Roy Wayne Jackson, Jr.
Defendant: UNKNOWN MAKER OF ZANTAC RANITIDINE, CMC Pharmacy and University Texas Medical Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kahoe v. Tiffany et al
as 3:2024cv00333
Plaintiff: Lonnie J. Kahoe, Sr.
Defendant: Unknown Tiffany, Unknown Peridoux and Unknown Staff Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kahoe v. Heemans et al
as 3:2024cv00334
Plaintiff: Lonnie J. Kahoe, Sr.
Defendant: Karen Heemans and Justin Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 2:2024cv01109
Plaintiff: Sorrell Joseph Jackson
Defendant: Correct Care Solutions, Randy Smith, Jose Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollins v. Holloway
as 3:2024cv00566
Plaintiff: Earl Hollins
Defendant: Lt Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?