District Court Cases in Mississippi
Cases 101 - 110 of 62,724
United States of America v. Williams
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jameka Lashell Williams
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America v. Falkner
as 3:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jeleesa Falkner
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America v. Bell
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jemario Bell
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Fischer v. Young et al
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Matthew Fischer
Defendant:
Trooper Jason Young and Mississippi Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aiken v. Bell et al
as 3:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Aaron Aiken
Defendant:
Trooper Cameron Bell and Mississippi Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dillon v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 5:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Camita Dillon
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Gibson v. Federal Express Corporation
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
D'Monterrio Gibson
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Necaise v. Bay St. Louis-Waveland School District
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Amy Necaise
Defendant:
Bay St. Louis-Waveland School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blair v. Stone County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Harleen Blair
Defendant:
Stone County, Mississippi, Mike Farmer, Philip L. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Cain et al
as 3:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Dennis Thompson
Defendant:
Burl Cain and Lynn Fitch
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
