US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 136
Dondero v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company et al
as 2:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
William Bryce Dondero
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Company and Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Tyson v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company et al
as 2:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Ty Markham Tyson
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Company and Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Smocks v United States of America The
as 4:2022cv01028
Plaintiff:
Troy Anthony Smocks
Defendant:
United States of America The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
ANTWINE v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD et al
as 5:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTWINE
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD and GREIS TRUCKING AND EXCAVATION INC
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
v. ANTWINE et al
as 5:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W ANTWINE
Defendant:
Union Pacific Rr Co
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Gladney v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 2:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Everett C. Gladney
Defendant:
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Joe v. Railroad Co.
as 5:2021cv00152
Plaintiff:
Marvin Joe
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
COLQUITT V UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
as 2:2021cv00385
Plaintiff:
CLINT COLQUITT
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RR and UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Stewart v. Michael G. Hartline et al
as 2:2020cv00187
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Misty Rene McCathern, Michael G. Hartline and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Joe Stewart
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
