US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 4,768
Thompson v. City of Van et al
as 6:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Mary . Thompson
Defendant:
city of van, Tammy Huff, Melissa Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Heath v. Webster et al
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Quinton Webster, Titus Webster and Rodney Hayden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hoots v. Family Protective Services
as 2:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Tracy Hoots
Defendant:
Family Protective Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Headman v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
as 6:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Alan Headman
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Heath v. Horton et al
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Billy . Horton, Kaleh Adams and Kentrell Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Johnson et al v. Unknown et al
as 6:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Johnson and Rhonda Sallie
Defendant:
Sheri Unknown, TitleMax Incorporated (Lufkin Store) and TitleMax, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
