US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 11,930
Johnson v. Sheriff of Ellis County
as 3:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Richard Johnson
Defendant:
Sheriff of Ellis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. Sheriff of Ellis County
as 3:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Contreras
Defendant:
Sheriff of Ellis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coler v. Sheriff of Ellis County
as 3:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
Christopher Coler
Defendant:
Sheriff of Ellis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
John Francis
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. 195th Judicial District Court Criminal District Court No. 2
as 3:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Martin
Defendant:
195th Judicial District Court Criminal District Court No. 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1455 Notice of Removal of Criminal Prosecution
Dillard v. Cozby et al
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Dillard
Defendant:
FNU Cozby, FNU Merchant and FNU Turnbow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montemayor v. Parker
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Frank Montemayor
Defendant:
Stan Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salas v. Ramirez et al
as 4:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Salas
Defendant:
FNU Ramirez, Kristine Carouth and Tarrant County Corrections Center Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holland v. Warden Rule et al
as 4:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Justina Maria Holland
Defendant:
Warden Rule, Shane Feeney, Captain Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucas v. Straughan et al
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Alan Lucas
Defendant:
Clayton Straughan and Sue Gamez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
