US District Court for the Western District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 7,580
Wheelock v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00416
Petitioner:
Scott Ralph Wheelock
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Krueger v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00417
Petitioner:
Kent Anthony Krueger
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Krueger v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00418
Petitioner:
Kent Anthony Krueger
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hollenbeck v. Lange
as 6:2024cv00201
Petitioner:
Tae Hollenbeck
Defendant:
State of Texas
Respondent:
Sheriff Eddy Lange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cabello v. Hijar
as 3:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Archie Cabello
Respondent:
Sandra Hijar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Noonan v. Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice et al
as 3:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Noonan
Respondent:
Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice and Richard Wiles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Clark v. Collier-TDCJ Executive Director
as 6:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Reginald Lee Clark
Respondent:
Brian Collier-TDCJ Executive Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McBride v. Enge
as 1:2024cv00379
Petitioner:
Thomas Richie McBride
Respondent:
Warden Jamadre L. Enge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McBride v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00198
Petitioner:
Thomas Richie McBride
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rudluff v. Rosalez
as 1:2024cv00373
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Steven Rudluff
Respondent:
Warden G. Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
