Texas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 38,367
Tamborello v. Town of Highland Park, Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01356
Plaintiff:
Sam C Tamborello
Defendant:
Town of Highland Park, Texas, William (Bill) Lindley, Tobin Maples and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boyd Meador v. Pittman
as 3:2024cv01389
Plaintiff:
Laura Kristen Boyd Meador
Defendant:
Mark Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brown et al v. City of Leander
as 1:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brown, Maria Brown and ZG Properties, LLC
Defendant:
City of Leander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Zapata v. Howze et al
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Emiliano Zapata
Defendant:
Jennifer Smyth Howze, David Weatherford, Jennifer Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Bailey v. Gerber et al
as 1:2024cv00612
Plaintiff:
Meoshi M Bailey
Defendant:
Michael Gerber, Lisa Garcia, Texas Workforce Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
