Sixth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,069
Fusco et al v. Ross et al
as 2:2023cv11146
Plaintiff:
Pam Fusco, Nancy Russell and Sohlne Hannah
Defendant:
Amber Ross, d/b/a Strong Water Malamutes, AR, a minor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Sills et al v. Southern Baptist Convention et al
as 3:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Michael David Sills and Mary Sills
Defendant:
Southern Baptist Convention, Dr. Ed Litton, Lifeway Christian Resources of the Southern Baptist Convention and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Sanders v. Hill et al
as 5:2023cv00924
Plaintiff:
J. C. Sanders
Defendant:
Judy Hill and Edward Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Versosky v. Dutra
as 2:2023cv11061
Plaintiff:
Amber Versosky
Defendant:
Paul Dutra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Samson v. Mays (JRG3)
as 4:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Samson
Defendant:
Amy Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jones v. Valverde et al
as 2:2023cv10954
Plaintiff:
Sherline Jones
Defendant:
Teresa Valverde, Merico Zanotti, David Stockwell and others
Bowmar et al v. Hearst Properties, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Sarah Bowmar and Josh Bowmar
Defendant:
Hearst Properties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Libel,Assault,Slander
Sheldon Green v. FedEx Supply Chain, Inc.
as 23-5333
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHELDON GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDEX SUPPLY CHAIN, INC.
Kemari Averett v. Shirley Hardy, et al
as 23-5319
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEMARI AVERETT
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRLEY ANN HARDY, Student Conduct Officer, ANGELA B. TAYLOR, Assistant Dean of Students, MICHAEL MARDIS, Dean of Students and Vice Provost for Student Affairs, Employees and administrators of the Code of Student Conduct , individually and in their official capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.