Sixth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Death Penalty Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 61 - 70 of 604
Wogenstahl v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00298
Petitioner: Jeffrey A Wogenstahl
Respondent: Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Debra Brown v. Wanza Jackson, et al
as 17-3416
Petitioner - Appellee: DEBRA DENISE BROWN
Respondent: SHIRLEY A. ROGERS
Respondent - Appellant: GREGORY F. ZOELLER
Bonnell v. Jenkins
as 1:2017cv00787
Petitioner: Melvin Bonnell
Respondent: Charlotte Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Bobby Sheppard
as 17-3190
Movant: In re: BOBBY T. SHEPPARD
Respondent: NORM ROBINSON, Warden
In re: David Sneed
as 17-3155
Movant: In re: DAVID SNEED
Respondent: CHARLOTTE JENKINS
In re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litig. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-3076
: In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Plaintiff: ANGELO FEARS, et al
Plaintiff - Appellee: GARY OTTE, RONALD PHILLIPS and RAYMOND TIBBETTS
Defendant - Appellant: DONALD MORGAN, Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility, ANONYMOUS EXECUTION TEAM MEMBERS 1-50, c/o Southern Ohio Correctional Facility, JOHN KASICH, Governor, State of Ohio and others
Phillips v. Jenkins We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00184
Petitioner: Ronald Phillips
Respondent: Charlotte Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Douglas Coley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-3071
Movant: In re: DOUGLAS L. COLEY
Respondent: CHARLOTTE JENKINS
In re: Elwood Jone
as 17-3066
Movant: In re: ELWOOD H. JONES
Respondent: WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Samuel Fields v. Randy White
as 17-5065
Petitioner - Appellant: SAMUEL FIELDS
Respondent - Appellee: RANDY WHITE, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?