Sixth Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 8,556
Turner v. Creative Foam Corporation
as 2:2024cv10629
Plaintiff:
Kavel Turner
Defendant:
Creative Foam Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Robinson v. Hutchinson Antivibration Systems, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Maurice Robinson
Defendant:
Hutchinson Antivibration Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
U.S. Department of Labor v. Constant Care Home Health Services, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
U.S. Department of Labor
Defendant:
Constant Care Home Health Services, LLC and Duncan Muchiri
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Buford v. Hurley Medical Center
as 4:2024cv10620
Plaintiff:
Chevon Buford
Defendant:
Hurley Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Buford v. McLaren Flint
as 4:2024cv10621
Plaintiff:
Chevon Buford
Defendant:
McLaren Flint
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gardner v. Carvana, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Vonda Gardner
Defendant:
Carvana, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Fambro v. J & P Sommer Burritos, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Diane Fambro
Defendant:
J & P Sommer Burritos, LLC, Jason Sommer and Pamela Sommer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Vazquez et al. v. LULO Enterprises, LLC, et al.
as 1:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
David Vazquez and Joanna Rodriguez
Defendant:
LULO Enterprises, LLC doing business as LULO Kitchen & Juice Bar and Mario Montoya
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Reese v. Future Restaurants, LLC
as 3:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Christopher Reese
Defendant:
Future Restaurants, LLC doing business as Taco Bell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Boykin v. U.S. Farathane, LLC
as 2:2024cv10563
Plaintiff:
Gina Boykin
Defendant:
U.S. Farathane, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
