Sixth Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 2,589
Ancona v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2023cv12400
Plaintiff:
Austin Ancona
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Kim, Jim Newell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
James Stanley v. Macomb County, MI
as 23-1842
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES STANLEY
Defendant / Appellant:
MACOMB COUNTY, MI
Booker v. Republic Steel
as 5:2023cv01771
Plaintiff:
Terry Booker
Defendant:
Republic Steel, Corp. and Republic Steel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101 Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification Act
United States of America v. A1 Tree Removal & Roofing, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01743
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
A1 Tree Removal & Roofing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Haack v. Lapeer County Road Commission et al
as 4:2023cv12273
Plaintiff:
Joe Haack
Defendant:
Lapeer County Road Commission and Zebadiah Schons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (handicap)
Kelly v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
James Kelly
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency and Jason Maxedon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Other Labor Litigation
Bahensky v. Condado Tacos
as 2:2023cv02694
Plaintiff:
Liliana Bahensky
Defendant:
Condado Tacos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Howard Brebberman v. Cty of Maumee, OH
as 23-3683
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD BREBBERMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MAUMEE, OH
Hephner v. Altenloh, Brinck & Co., U.S., Inc.
as 2:2023cv11985
Plaintiff:
Sean Hephner
Defendant:
Altenloh, Brinck & Co., U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Catlett v. Avis Budget Group
as 3:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
Dale A. Catlett
Defendant:
Avis Budget Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
