Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 5,407
Foster v. Ohio et al
as 2:2024cv01598
Plaintiff:
Christopher Foster
Defendant:
Ohio and Core Civic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Henry
as 3:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
DeAmontae Manning
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Christopher Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silver v. Jecubic et al.
as 1:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Terrell L. Silver
Defendant:
Sergeant Mr. Jecubic, Executive Cuyahoga County and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Warner, Jr
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Tracy Reveal, Chae Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Stammitti et al.
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Romero
Defendant:
Sheriff Phil R. Stammitti, Deputy Sheriff Shea Adkisson, Deputy Sheriff K9 Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Brown et al.
as 3:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
George Woods
Defendant:
Major Brown, Deputy Swartz and C/O John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Philpott v. City of Stow et al.
as 5:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Michael Philpott
Defendant:
City of Stow, Stephan W. Miller, Samantha R. Wike and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Harris et al
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Christian Smith
Defendant:
Chae Harris, C.O. McKinley, C.O. J. Umstead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Landhandle
as 1:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Isaac Peterson
Defendant:
Sheriff Kasey Landhandle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Henderson
as 3:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
DeAmontae Manning
Defendant:
Kimberly Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
