US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Civil Rights Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 2,606
West v. United States Bankruptcy Court Middle District TN
as 3:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Kendria Y. West
Defendant:
United States Bankruptcy Court Middle District TN and United States Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
John Doe and John Doe #59
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #019 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
John Doe #019
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #017 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
John Doe #017
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #018 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
John Doe #018
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boshers v. Maury County Board of Education, et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Don H. Boshers
Defendant:
Maury County Board of Education, Lisa A. Ventura and Chandler R. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 (DTB) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (DTB), John Doe #2 (MAB), John Doe #3 (DJB) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanford v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv01366
Plaintiff:
James R. Sanford, III
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee, David B. Rausch, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 2:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
John Doe and John Doe 73
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
