Tennessee Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 705
Coalesce Holdings, LLC et al v. Coalesce Solutions, LLC
as 3:2020cv00865
Plaintiff:
Coalesce Solutions, LLC, Coalesce Payments, LLC and Coalesce Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Titan Implement, LLC v. Titan Manufacturing and Distributing, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00273
Defendant:
Titan Manufacturing and Distributing, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Titan Implement, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Phillips 66 Company v. ATL Enterprise Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02706
Defendant:
ATL Enterprise Inc. and Sheikh Ahamed
Plaintiff:
Phillips 66 Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Red Viking Group, Inc. v. Enexor Health Systems, LLC
as 3:2020cv00788
Defendant:
Enexor Health Systems, LLC
Plaintiff:
Red Viking Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
UTZ Quality Foods, LLC v. Dirty South BBQ Co, LLC, et. al. (PLR3)
as 4:2020cv00043
Defendant:
Timothy Troy LONG, TROY LONG and Dirty South BBQ Co., LLC
Plaintiff:
UTZ Quality Foods, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
TTAC Publishing, LLC v. TATC Publishing, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00696
Defendant:
Jonathan Hunsaker, Manny Goldman, Patrick Gentempo and others
Plaintiff:
TTAC Publishing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
JUUL Labs, Inc. v. Express Novelty, Inc.
as 2:2020cv02602
Defendant:
Express Novelty, Inc.
Plaintiff:
JUUL Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Sream, Inc v. Chaudhari Brothers, Inc
as 1:2020cv00212
Defendant:
Chaudhari Brothers, Inc and Chaudhari Brothers, Inc doing business as Citgo Kanku Market
Plaintiff:
Sream, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Sream, Inc. v. Kanku Express #21
as 1:2020cv00209
Defendant:
Kanku Express #21
Plaintiff:
Sream, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Sream, Inc v. Jospeh Chaudhari, LLC
as 1:2020cv00211
Defendant:
Jospeh Chaudhari, LLC and Jospeh Chaudhari, LLC doing business as Kanku's Exxon #5
Plaintiff:
Sream, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
