Tennessee Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17,531
Shaw v. Raymond's Auto Repair
as 2:2024cv02270
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Raymond's Auto Repair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Dermatology Realm et al
as 2:2024cv02271
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Dermatology Realm, Clarx Big Country Dermatology, Memphis Dermatology and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Dental Practice of Cordova et al
as 2:2024cv02268
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Dental Practice of Cordova, Mid-South Oral Surgery, Christ Community Broad Dental and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper v. Dunn et al
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Erik Cooper
Defendant:
James Bruce Dunn, Ronald Crockett Newcomb, William Brownlow Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper v. Sevier County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Erik Cooper
Defendant:
Sevier County, Tennessee, Michael R. Hodges, Jr., Rhett Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv02265
Plaintiff:
Herman Phillips
Defendant:
Governor William Lee, David Rausch, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Doe #062 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
John Doe #062
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
