Seventh Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 65,872
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
FRANKLIN et al v. SNYDER et al
as 4:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE FRANKLIN and ALANA FRANKLIN
Defendant:
GRANT SNYDER, KURT WOLFE and LAFAYETTE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SIMMONS-TAYLOR v. HENDRICKS COUNTY HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2024cv00749
Plaintiff:
TWANA SIMMONS-TAYLOR
Defendant:
HENDRICKS COUNTY HOSPITAL doing business as HAMILTON TRACE OF FISHERS, CARDON MANAGEMENT COMPANY II LLC and CARDON & ASSOCIATES INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins v. South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force et al
as 1:2024cv03555
Plaintiff:
Timothy Watkins
Defendant:
South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force, Village of Burnham, City of Oak Forest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Sabo v. McHenry County et al
as 3:2024cv50164
Plaintiff:
Todd Sabo
Defendant:
McHenry County, Robb Tadelman, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whiting et al v. Santos et al
as 1:2024cv03523
Plaintiff:
Antonio Whiting, Jeffery Hendrix and Sherrie Hendrix
Defendant:
Officer Anthony Santos, Officer Jeffery Marra and Village of Round Lake Park
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Minor v. Harsy
as 2:2024cv02099
Plaintiff:
Laquando Minor
Defendant:
Blake Harsy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Waukegan Potawatomi Casino, LLC v. City of Waukegan
as 24-1751
Plaintiff:
WAUKEGAN POTAWATOMI CASINO, LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF WAUKEGAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
