Seventh Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,001
Lindsey v. Walmart Inc.
as 1:2023cv04252
Plaintiff:
Joel Lindsey
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Hoyt v. Metalx Aluminum Conversions, LLC
as 3:2023cv00594
Plaintiff:
James Hoyt
Defendant:
MetalX Aluminum Conversions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Schaefer v. Morrison Community Hospital District
as 3:2023cv50223
Plaintiff:
Amber Schaefer
Defendant:
Morrison Community Hospital District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Lacy v. Kohl's Corporation
as 2:2023cv00765
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lacy
Defendant:
Kohl's Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act 1993
Liedke v. Brunswick Corporation
as 1:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
shereen liedke
Defendant:
Brunswick Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act 1993
Quaresima v. Lowe's Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03473
Plaintiff:
Erin Quaresima
Defendant:
Lowe's Companies, Inc. and Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
McCarter v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2023cv03280
Plaintiff:
Brandon McCarter
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
James v City of Urbana et al
as 2:2023cv02115
Plaintiff:
LeShawn James
Defendant:
City of Urbana, Diane Wolfe Marlin, Demond Dade and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
MUNDELL v. PROVIDENCE HEALTH CARE, INC.
as 2:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL L. MUNDELL
Defendant:
PROVIDENCE HEALTH CARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
NICHELSON v. LEXINGTON REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER et al
as 1:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
DONALD NICHELSON
Defendant:
LEXINGTON REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER and LESLIE MARSH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
