US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 11,287
Hale v. Cornett et al
as 3:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Alex L. Hale
Defendant:
T Cornett, Henrich and Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary v. Elkhart County Sheriffs Department et al
as 3:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Tervarus L Gary
Defendant:
Elkhart County Sheriffs Department, Jeff Segal and Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunigan v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00329
Petitioner:
Lee Evans Dunigan
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fuentes v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Joe Fuentes
Defendant:
Warden, Medical Providers and Transportation Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finnegan v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Russell Grant Finnegan
Defendant:
LeAnn Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00313
Petitioner:
James Michael Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crafton v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Crafton
Defendant:
Wendy Davis, Bailey Goodwin, Timothy Stucky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blount v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Carl Blount
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Pamela Bane and Mark Newkirk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Conley et al
as 3:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
John A Hawkins and John Anthony Hawkins-El
Defendant:
Tonya Conley, Donny Betzner and Richard Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Penick v. Rush et al
as 3:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Justin L Penick
Defendant:
Rush, English, Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
